Why is it that none of the "2" faction can cite any actual sources for their beliefs?
I gave the google page for order of operations. Pick one. Look at it.
My post 337 explains why I see/saw things the way I did. It's danged hard to undo a decade of pre-computer math learning. Fact is, there is something of a trap in using "horizontal" notation for those of us that are very accustomed to having our fractions written in a vertical manner.
Check Wikipedia:
"Division is often shown in algebra and science by placing the dividend over the divisor with a horizontal line, also called a vinculum or fraction bar, between them. For example, a divided by b is written
This can be read out loud as "a divided by b", "a by b" or "a over b". A way to express division all on one line is to write the dividend, or numerator then a slash, then the divisor, or denominator like this:
This is the usual way to specify division in most computer programming languages since it can easily be typed as a simple sequence of ASCII characters.
A typographical variation, which is halfway between these two forms, uses a solidus (fraction slash) but elevates the dividend, and lowers the divisor:
Any of these forms can be used to display a fraction. A fraction is a division expression where both dividend and divisor are integers (although typically called the numerator and denominator), and there is no implication that the division needs to be evaluated further. A second way to show division is to use the obelus (or division sign), common in arithmetic, in this manner:
Here is a YouTube video that should eliminate all the excuses of the 288ers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiQ_q0oXVdU