Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: meyer

I think the major disconnect here is between those who see a “/” sign and just assume that everything after it is in the denominator of the division expression.

And those who see “/” as a mathematical operation between expressions on either side of it.

The former force implied parentheses into their evaluation.

The latter do not.


308 posted on 04/12/2011 4:48:40 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
And those who see “/” as a mathematical operation between expressions on either side of it.

That's roughly what I was seeing - the division of two distinct expressions that required simplification before the dividing process needed to take place. Spunkets kind of broke it down a bit for me, got me to see it the other way.

319 posted on 04/12/2011 5:11:33 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave
I think the major disconnect here is between those who see a “/” sign and just assume that everything after it is in the denominator of the division expression.

And those who see “/” as a mathematical operation between expressions on either side of it.

The former force implied parentheses into their evaluation.

The latter do not.

I think both sides are forcing an implied parentheses into their evaluation.

The 288 crowd are implying a parenthesis like this:

(48/2)(9+3)

The 2 crowd are implying a parenthesis like this:

48 / [2(9=3)]

The mathematical expression is written ambiguously.

533 posted on 04/13/2011 9:16:07 AM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson