Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Forty-Niner

Can you cite a rule anywhere that says any calculation that looks like the distributive property of multiplication voids the normal precedence of operations in an algebraic equation?

Thanks


246 posted on 04/12/2011 3:47:45 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave

“Can you cite a rule anywhere that says any calculation that looks like the distributive property of multiplication voids the normal precedence of operations in an algebraic equation?”

Sister Mary Joseph’s 12 inch rule rapped across the hand. 5th grade algebra class 1950’s.

Do they still teach algebra in the 5th grade?


258 posted on 04/12/2011 3:57:02 PM PDT by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave

“Can you cite a rule anywhere that says any calculation that looks like the distributive property of multiplication voids the normal precedence of operations in an algebraic equation?”

The Order of Operations which is 4 rules, NOT 6.

P: Simplify inside parentheses first.
E: Then apply Laws of Exponents
MD: Then multiply OR divide from left to right as it occurs
AS: Then add OR subtract from left to right as it occurs

(Too bad math textbook writers seldom know laws of arithmetic.)

The Distributive Law doesn’t apply for this expression because of the Order of Operations. The Distributive Law would apply if there was a + or - before the 2(9 + 3).

So, 48/2(9 + 3) = 48/2(12) = (48/2)(12) = 24(12) = 288


287 posted on 04/12/2011 4:27:46 PM PDT by MIsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson