Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

48÷2(9+3) = ?

Posted on 04/12/2011 1:32:09 PM PDT by grundle

Texas Instruments TI-85 says:

48÷2(9+3) = 2

But Texas Instruments TI-86 says:

48÷2(9+3) = 288



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: algebra; math; mdas; pemdas; texasinstruments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 661-670 next last
To: Melas

It’s not a fraction. The backslash is another way to write a division sign just as a * is used instead of x for multiplication


381 posted on 04/12/2011 6:08:26 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (Don't retreat...reload!.....and no, I'm not changing my tagline! Pray for Sarah and her family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
As you have said, the answer is 2. I've done more math in my life than I care to admit (I'm a civil engineer). Having said that, a few more parentheses would have made the equation alot less ambiguous.
382 posted on 04/12/2011 6:08:44 PM PDT by oldvike (I'm too drunk to taste THIS chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

OK, good point. My point is that a division operator does not automatically make everything to the right of it a denominator.

People who read it that way are considering the sign to be making a fraction. That’s not what the symbol means. As I said in my post 308.


383 posted on 04/12/2011 6:10:16 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I'm also an engineer who used the TI-85 nearly 20 years ago so I know how the orders work in that calculator which is not consistent with almost all programming languages and newer generation calculators most of which listen to Auntie BEDMAS.

I've pretty-much done all my fun math with pencil and paper, saving the calculator for larger numbers. Just wrote things the way I did for 20 years. Never dove much into using the computer for these things, outside of a few interesting Excel spreadsheets and some old BASIC calculations. Precious little compared to the pencil and paper stuff though.

BTW, I take it that B=brackets, as opposed tParentheseses.

It's amazing how much fun we seem to have had with a simple math problem with NO variables!

384 posted on 04/12/2011 6:10:49 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: meyer
In the future, I will "parenthesize" in a manner that makes it obvious as to which order is to be followed.

Yes, that is the key takeaway. If people can confuse your meaning, use some parentheses.

385 posted on 04/12/2011 6:12:14 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: oldvike

“As you have said, the answer is 2. I’ve done more math in my life than I care to admit (I’m a civil engineer). Having said that, a few more parentheses would have made the equation alot less ambiguous.”

You’d better brush up a bit, then. Otherwise, perhaps you can explain how you arrive at an answer of 2?


386 posted on 04/12/2011 6:12:16 PM PDT by RBranha (Captialism is the natural outgrowth of human freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Melas
It would make more sense if it looked like this:

If it looked like that, the answer would be 2. But if you want to write that in a single line (as a programming expression), you need to add parentheses to your denominator. Without them, the rules of order yield 288.

So, as written, the answer is 288.

387 posted on 04/12/2011 6:14:37 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

“It really didn’t discuss this specific form; however, the precedence rules along with the associative and communitive rules just don’t provide a means to invent an imaginary parenthetical grouping......”

Which is why you cannot regroup the equation to (48/2)((9+3)

Nor can you arbitrarily add a * between the 2 and the (9+3) in order to justify incorrectly applying precedence rules....

The answer, as the equation is written, is 2.


388 posted on 04/12/2011 6:14:52 PM PDT by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: RBranha

Nothing to brush up on. I’m right. Anybody that comes up with 288 is wrong. Thanks for the advice, though.


389 posted on 04/12/2011 6:15:24 PM PDT by oldvike (I'm too drunk to taste THIS chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
The division sign denotes a fraction with everything before it as the numerator and everything after it the denominator.

Not in the digital age, my FRiend.

390 posted on 04/12/2011 6:15:51 PM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

I don't understand how all of you who are changing a division symbol to a modern calculator slash symbol are thinking. It was NOT written with a slash it WAS written with a division symbol which separates the problem into what is before the symbol and what is after the symbol. Do all the math on either side of the symbol AND THEN do the division.

The answer IS 2 and you will never convince me otherwise.

Just a dumb old man here...

391 posted on 04/12/2011 6:17:25 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (U S Troops Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Lol, all division is an expression of a fraction, or vice versa, which is the same. Or rather that is to say that all fractions are expressed ratios of two numbers or equations, and all division is a quotient of that ratio. They are intertwined. The horizontal line in a fraction is just a useful tool to help visually clarify the equation, and even simple division is indeed an equation.


392 posted on 04/12/2011 6:18:35 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner
Nor can you arbitrarily add a * between the 2 and the (9+3) in order to justify incorrectly applying precedence rules....

What is this operation called when there is no "*" or "x" to tell you it is multiplication?

Where are these precedence rules given that you are following? I have cited the standard, accepted rules. As many others have. There is no exception listed for "multiplication without an explicit symbol." Tell us where this rule is.

393 posted on 04/12/2011 6:19:24 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts

your examples all hinge on denominators that have higher precedence than the division. That is not equivalent to the case at hand.


394 posted on 04/12/2011 6:19:48 PM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

LOL

Thank hubby for me, please. :D


395 posted on 04/12/2011 6:21:05 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Algebra/Order_of_Operations

These are the rules. Can you find this rule of yours:

“Do all the math on either side of the symbol AND THEN do the division.”


396 posted on 04/12/2011 6:21:34 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: oldvike

“Nothing to brush up on. I’m right. Anybody that comes up with 288 is wrong. Thanks for the advice, though.”

Tell us why you’re right. FYI, if you are right, that means that Excel, Google, bc, and programs written in C, C#, PHP, JavaScript, and my HP50g are wrong. If you’re right it should be easy to explain.

Before you can ask, I’ll tell you why 288 is right. The order of operations is

Parens
Mult and Div (equal to each other)
Add and Subt (equal to each other)
Operators with equal precedence are evaluated from left to right.

48÷2(9+3) =
48÷2(12) = [Because operations inside parens are evaluated first]
24(12) = 288 [Because mult and div have equal precedence & evaluated L to R]

Where is the error in my work?


397 posted on 04/12/2011 6:21:45 PM PDT by RBranha (Captialism is the natural outgrowth of human freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Melas

In the digital age, the slash is an operator, with expressions on either side subject to the order of operations.


398 posted on 04/12/2011 6:22:58 PM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Dust in the Wind
The answer IS 2 and you will never convince me otherwise.

See my post at 368

399 posted on 04/12/2011 6:22:59 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Ah yes, but in this case the original post read 48÷2(9+3) and math books do use the backslash to denote division. This particular problem is not 48 as the numerator over 12 as the denominator...it’s 48 divided by 2.


400 posted on 04/12/2011 6:24:14 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (Don't retreat...reload!.....and no, I'm not changing my tagline! Pray for Sarah and her family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 661-670 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson