“I’d be happy to discuss Pamela Mosier-Boss’s work on one of the threads dedicated to it, like this one http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212864/posts";
That thread is 2 years old (2009). It seems anyone who bet money on “Dr Arata’s experiment to be replicated in peer-reviewed scientific journal on/before 31 Dec 2009” lost their money. Read a good part of that thread: you and your ilk gave no sound argumentation for your beliefs.
‘My comment was towards the “near certainty” that there will never be true cold fusion unless some exotic matter is found.’
Kevmo, why are you retreating? You need to defend the pure and true cold fusion with your last breath and dollar!!!
‘If you’re saying he’s right, then prove it. “
I did. You said Mosier-Boss’ work proved fusion. dila813 said LENR does not imply cold fusion. I gave arguments that the vaunted triple tracks is due to fission (NOT FUSION) of carbon nuclei by energetic electrons producing 3 alpha particles. Thus I prooved you wrong and dila813 correct. You really need to read what I write.
‘The remainder of your post was about other things besides what I wrote.’
Au contraire. I am giving you scientific background for you to understand the veracity of dila813’s POV and the fallacy of your POV. You do not appear to have any scientific or engineering background. You are in love with the idea of cold fusion. And there are people who are attracted to lost causes. You collect any and all news that positively reinforces your beliefs. You yourself cannot debate the issues on your own and you just give us lists of collected url’s.
On Intrade, I see nothing related to cold fusion. But I see Focus Fusion which plans to split boron nuclei with deuterium ions, similar to the mechanism of neutron generators used by oil companies to inspect pipeline integrity. This is - again - fission but I need to look further as to the proposed technology.
Kevmo, when R. Mills or Rossi will go IPO? If they do, I will sell short their stock in an instant.
That thread is 2 years old (2009).
***I said I would be happy to discuss it on a thread LIKE that one. It appears you have a problem with the english language.
Read a good part of that thread: you and your ilk gave no sound argumentation for your beliefs.
***Looks like you didn’t read the whole thing, which is about what I expect from naysayers. I love this expression, “you and your ilk”, it’s freeping hilarious. I gave enough sound argumentation for my beliefs that I was awarded the contract expiration in my favor. That seems to be more than you and your ilk can fathom.
‘My comment was towards the “near certainty” that there will never be true cold fusion unless some exotic matter is found.’
Kevmo, why are you retreating? You need to defend the pure and true cold fusion with your last breath and dollar!!!
***I see you’re resorting to the horse laugh fallacy, If this is an indication of your ability to reason properly, keep it up because it makes things easier for me. Why are you retreating? I directly wrote what I wrote and now you seem to want to argue against stuff that I didn’t write. Historically this is known as straw argumentation, another fallacy. Your logical reasoning is unsound, so why should we believe that your scientific reasoning is any better?
You said Mosier-Boss’ work proved fusion.
***BZZZZTTT wrong. Again arguing against something I did not write. Why are YOU retreating? What I wrote was: “My comment was towards the “near certainty” that there will never be true cold fusion unless some exotic matter is found. If you’re saying he’s right, then prove it.” And now you try to deflect over to Mosier-Boss’s work, using a straw argument. Fallacy. Looks like you don’t know how to reason properly.
Au contraire.
***If you wanna talk about Mosier-Boss’s work, then open a thread on it and invite me. I do not have confidence that your fallacious arguments will improve.
You do not appear to have any scientific or engineering background.
***I’ve got enough of a technical background to get others to pay me money for what I know about technical stuff. But you do not appear to have passed a Freshman level critical thinking class.
On Intrade, I see nothing related to cold fusion.
***Good for you. It appears you didn’t bother to read the article and now it seems almost like you’re bragging about it. Oh well, at least you comprehended enough to go over to Intrade, but if this is another example of your reading skills, there would be very little incentive to argue with you in the future. Thanks to Arrowhead1952 “I never argue with a fool, since someone observing the exchanges may not be able to tell who the fool is”.
Kevmo, when R. Mills or Rossi will go IPO?
***Who knows, who cares, and where do you get the idea that this has anything whatsoever to do with my mechanism for having made money on cold fusion? Is it yet another example of your reading skills, or a projection of your straw argumentating?
If they do, I will sell short their stock in an instant.
***Yeah, I’ve been round & round with ilk like you and when the time came, they didn’t put their money down in a manner which matched their invective. You’ll do the same.