Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon
The Dark Ages: Were They Darker Than We Imagined?

"Mike Baillie is Professor of Palaeoecology at Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland. He is an authority on tree rings and their use in dating ancient events (every year, a tree adds a "ring" to its trunk as it grows - good years are represented by thick rings while bad years are represented by thin rings). He conducted a complete (and continuous) review of annual global tree growth patterns over the last 5,000 years and found that there were five major environmental shocks that were witnessed worldwide. These shocks were reflected in the ring widths being very thin. Wanting to know more, he turned to human historical records, and found that the years in question (between 2354 and 2345 BC, 1628 and 1623 BC, 1159 and 1141 BC, 208 and 204 BC, and AD 536 and 545) all corresponded with "dark ages" in civilisation."

10 posted on 04/07/2011 11:32:46 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blam

Now I’m gonna go over this real slow-like, son. None a them dates is between 800 and 500 BC. ;-)


11 posted on 04/07/2011 11:38:40 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Where is the nearest source of copper? I agree these where perilous times.
20 posted on 04/07/2011 6:15:59 PM PDT by Little Bill (Harry Browne is a Poofter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson