To: dollarbull
The whole gold vs stocks thing is kind of lame. Under any circumstance, it’s insane not to have both in a well-rounded portfolio.
Gold is super-hot right now because we have monetary hyperinflation being masked by economic deflation; If we do a Greenspan-Reagan maneuver to pull out of this death spiral, you’ll see a spike in unemployment and interest rates... but then somehow, but a crash in gold. But then your stocks will start taking off, and if you rebalance your portfolio frequently, you’ll have taken your profits from gold already.
59 posted on
04/08/2011 11:52:50 PM PDT by
dangus
To: dangus
The whole gold vs stocks thing is kind of lame. Under any circumstance, its insane not to have both in a well-rounded portfolio.
You're just a fount of knowledge today aren't you? To paraphrase PTJ "gold is just an asset like any other, it's got it's time and place. that time is now"
Gold has crushed stocks +10 years running now, so NO it's NOT appropriate to have gold and stocks, unless you want to underperform.
I will sell gold for stocks and RE when the valuations have adjusted to all the money printing and guys like you are buying gold at $5K/oz.
61 posted on
04/09/2011 7:21:54 AM PDT by
dollarbull
(why are paperbugs so bad at history?)
To: dangus
Gold is super-hot right now because we have monetary hyperinflation being masked by economic deflation; If we do a Greenspan-Reagan maneuver to pull out of this death spiral, youll see a spike in unemployment and interest rates... but then somehow, but a crash in gold. But then your stocks will start taking off, and if you rebalance your portfolio frequently, youll have taken your profits from gold already.
How's that working out for ya? Down cratering and gold about to pierce $1700...
63 posted on
08/07/2011 6:59:36 PM PDT by
dollarbull
(why are paperbugs so bad at history?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson