[dfwgator]

It would have been a better movie had they done it more from the perspective of the crew, instead of turning it into a chick flick.

[SIDENET]

It would have been a better movie had they done it more from the perspective of the crew, instead of turning it into a chick flick.

OMG, Titanic was an insult to the senses.

I kept waiting for them to trot out something like a time machine, an alien, nazis, or just have someone dying of cancer.

It would not have made the movie any more lame or unbelievable than it already was.

Okay, I can be a bit harsh, but gay, cyborg, nazi zombies from outer space suddenly appearing on the ship to eat Leo's brain would have been an improvement.

[ConservativeWarrior]

It would have been a better movie had they done it more from the perspective of the crew, instead of turning it into a chick flick.

You've got that right. Same thing with Pearl Harbor.

I saw the Pearl Harbor teaser in the movie theater. It was a gorgeous sequence of Jap planes launching from carriers, breaking through cloud cover, and dive bombing a battleship. The perspective for the final scene was a chase view of a bomb being dropped. The special effects were outstanding, and you could see the crew scattering over the deck as the bomb reached its target.

When I went to the theater 4 months later, all I got was a bunch of pansies cast as pilots, some crass hags cast as "hero nurses", and a 2 hour soap opera with a few battle scenes tossed in at the end.

Pearl Harbor was the most dissapointing movie ever filmed. Period.