Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New advice: Tots safest in rear-facing car seats until age 2
MSNBC ^ | March 21, 2011 | CARLA K. JOHNSON

Posted on 03/21/2011 12:07:48 PM PDT by Immerito

CHICAGO — Children should ride in rear-facing car seats longer, until they are 2 years old instead of 1, according to updated advice from a medical group and a federal agency.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued separate but consistent new recommendations Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: carseats; children; safety
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Immerito

And up to 12 years old in booster seats for smaller kids.

My grandson is just 10 and only because he hit 100 lbs and got to fat did he get out of the stupid thing.


41 posted on 03/21/2011 1:23:12 PM PDT by GailA (2012 rally cry DEMOCRATS and RINOS are BAD for the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Well, of course! Seat belts could wrinkle your clothes and that was back in the day when almost everything had to be ironed!


42 posted on 03/21/2011 1:33:49 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

I feel sorry for the two-year old, staring at a seat. How boring...I’m sure they’ll be squirming the entire time.


43 posted on 03/21/2011 1:36:05 PM PDT by truthkeeper ( Life is a pre-existing condition - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNGal
When they were forced to put on the brakes or stop suddenly my brother and I just sort of rolled around in the interior of the car! We managed to survive somehow.

I got the old arm across the chest, a technique I became quite adept at using on my own kids. (As they constantly remind me.)

44 posted on 03/21/2011 1:38:00 PM PDT by truthkeeper ( Life is a pre-existing condition - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Rode ‘backwards’ in a limo once...came damn close to puking on the woman who was visibly annoyed that she had to ride in the same confined space with unrefined trash like my wife and I. In hindsight; I should have let ‘er rip on her lap instead of on the side of 94 several miles after we ditched her.


45 posted on 03/21/2011 1:39:55 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
In my opion the child is ‘safest’ when the driver can see them as needed and is not worried they might have found something to choke on

You are absolutely right. Having a daughter who aspirated a peanut at 13 months and a granddaughter who is prone to coughing/choking fits, I can tell you it's a real concern to a driving parent.

46 posted on 03/21/2011 1:41:27 PM PDT by truthkeeper ( Life is a pre-existing condition - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto

I know. I’ve seen several comments in this thread that leave me with the impression that there are actually people out there that would have children standing in the front seat so they could see over the dash. I admit it, I don’t get it, don’t want to get, and will likely never get it.


47 posted on 03/21/2011 1:44:19 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

You’re absolutely right! How many children fall asleep and are left to die in a hot car because the child is not in full view of the parents who may be distracted in this economy! Before the law was changed, our daughter was in the car seat facing the back in the seat beside me. I could see her and tend to her if needed. We are sick and tired of the government being in our business 24/7!!!


48 posted on 03/21/2011 1:52:40 PM PDT by Fran B (Love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

My advice: Drive carefully and it doesn’t matter.


49 posted on 03/21/2011 2:23:19 PM PDT by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fran B

There are some parenting issues where parental discretion is best. Some examples might be how long and when your child sleeps, who cares for your child during the day, and where your child goes to school. You, as a parent, can observe how your child reacts to different situations and make the best decision based on that.

Car seat safety is another matter. Just because you have driven around for x many years with your child forward-facing, or sitting in the front seat, or riding in the back in a tricycle and you haven’t gotten into an accident doesn’t mean it’s safe or good! The statistics clearly show what the safest options are. Why would anyone blatantly disregard them?

I understand the desire to tend to you child in the car. But being able to pop a paci back in the baby’s mouth is not as important as having my child safe in case of an accident. If you have your child in a backseat with a mirror, tilt the child seat properly, and not have anything around that they could choke on, they will be safest.

FWIW, I am sure that far more children are injured or killed each year due to being improperly restrained than being left in the backseat because their parents forgot them. By your logic, why not drive with your child on your lap?

I feel like many on this thread toss this important advice out as a way of “sticking it to liberals,” or because they want to rationalize their own unsafe behavior.

Look at the statistics, read your car seat manual from cover to cover, and keep your child safe! car-safety.org is a good source of information.


50 posted on 03/21/2011 3:10:47 PM PDT by elisabeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: elisabeth

There are safety precautions (using seat belts for older children and car seats for infants and toddlers) and there are excessive safety precautions.

If a parent chooses to abide by the new guidelines, based on their family’s peculiar needs, I have no problem with it.

But if the AAP’s recommendation is not as well-heeded as they would like, will they be satisfied with a mere recommendation or will they press to make their “recommendation” law?

Keeping a rear-facing car seat until age 2 may be perfect for some parents, depending on the age, weight, height and temperament of their children. However, if a parent gets into an accident BECAUSE he/she was startled by/distracted by what their rear-facing child was doing, then said accident defeats the purpose of the new recommendation, in my opinion.

It is all about making a judgment call based on your knowledge of your children and your family.


51 posted on 03/21/2011 5:02:30 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Then perhaps it is your impression that is at fault, and not the actual comments made by the other posters.


52 posted on 03/21/2011 5:03:53 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Melas

I said nothing about withholding information.


53 posted on 03/21/2011 5:08:49 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I’ve got a couple female friends who’d have been in booster seats except when preggo, then....


54 posted on 03/21/2011 6:16:40 PM PDT by Fire_on_High (Stupid should hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto

I haven’t seen anyone making that argument.

The argument I am seeing is that there are reasonable safety measures, and there are unreasonable measures taken in the name of safety.

An unhappy, bored toddler screaming in the back seat in his rear-facing car seat is a distraction to the parent/driver. It is counterproductive to employ a safety measure that is more likely to result in you being MORE distracted by your child and therefore paying LESS attention to other vehicles and the road ahead of you.


55 posted on 03/21/2011 6:47:04 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
But if the AAP’s recommendation is not as well-heeded as they would like, will they be satisfied with a mere recommendation or will they press to make their “recommendation” law?

The correct answer to that question is: They press to make their “recommendation” law.

They ALWAYS do.

56 posted on 03/22/2011 7:13:25 AM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Future slugger or football star perhaps ;D! I don’t envy your grocery bill in the next 10 years. He’s a big fella.


57 posted on 03/22/2011 7:37:13 AM PDT by poobear (FACTS - the turd in the punch bowl of liberal thought!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
I haven’t seen anyone making that argument.

Then you didn't look at #15, #17, #18, or #49.

58 posted on 03/22/2011 8:25:10 AM PDT by Palmetto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto

Your argument is a twisting of the arguments those posters actually made.

#15 is reminiscing on the poster’s childhood. The poster makes no claim as to her current views on the subject of seatbelts.

#17 is another example of reminiscence. The poster again makes no claim as to her current views on the subject of seatbelts.

#18 is another example of reminiscence in the same vein as #15 and #17.

#49 is an injunction to drive carefully.

None of which is an example of the position you claimed they held. It seems that you have invented a position for them in lieu of responding to their actual positions or asking them, “What is your current position on automotive safety for children?”.


59 posted on 03/22/2011 10:51:39 AM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson