Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
Then, according to the records, since his actions were to be predicated on Confederate action, would you supply the date and time of the assault on Ft. Moultrie.

There was no assault on Ft. Moultrie, at least until it was abandoned by Anderson, whereupon the South Carolinians did seize it (and since it wasn't actually their property, it really WAS a seizure). But Anderson's orders didn't tell him that he had to wait for an all-out assault. His orders of December 11 told him that he need only "have tangible evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act" and that he had in abundance. Pickens threat to put state troops into Sumter, the armed patrol boats who, when asked what they were doing, responded "you'll find out in a week" warnings that civic leaders would try to control the mob, but that the forts would be theirs "one way or another" (Klein, 152), and provided Anderson with plenty of evidence of design.

217 posted on 03/28/2011 7:14:57 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
You finally agree that: "There was no assault on Ft. Moultrie...".

Very good.

"His orders of December 11 told him that he need only "have tangible evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act"

So, where was the tangible evidence?

237 posted on 04/01/2011 6:59:12 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson