I cannot know if it is the same since yours failed, but I did a google phrase search and found an account of it.
"What Doubleday says is that their entire movement drew no fire which proves the point that Anderson was not threatened (which Doubleday's account shows they were)
You did not give evidence of that.
"and had no reason remove himself (which they most assuredly did)
You gave no evidence of this.
And according to your post of Doubleday's account, they saw no one?
So where was the threat?
After all that, and in summary where is your evidence of:
1. "...if attacked...",
2. "... an attack on or attempt to take possession of any one of them...",
3 "...whenever you have tangible evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act.
Of course you did.