To: pissant
It could be a setup. Springer appeals to the lowbrow daytime crowd almost indistinguishable from Oprah and the Talk. No reason for any of them to diverge from their formula unless it is a setup. Think of it this way: if Springer advocates in favor of Palin for a while, and then does a reverse and begins to disparage her later, what does he lose? Nothing. What does he win? More publicity and more notoriety. And likely even more lowbrow viewers. Also Palin’s detractors could forever afterwards say that she is trying to appeal to her trailer trash by appearing on Springer and that proves it. They would only say this on highbrow shows which would otherwise lock out a neutral interview of Palin.
2 posted on
02/25/2011 2:46:35 PM PST by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: SteveH
EWWW-WAH! If Palin were to appear on the Springer show.....she’d have to fumigate afterward. I’d be afraid of catching something on that set.
6 posted on
02/25/2011 2:55:51 PM PST by
LaineyDee
(Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
To: SteveH
Democrat Springer, on a story from CNN, playing the "please don't throw me in the briar patch" routine concerning Sarah...the old, "I like her, but..." line. We've heard it a thousand times and it's still a load of crap.
An endorsement from springer is like a shot in the back...
Here's pissant's favorite graphic...
13 posted on
02/25/2011 3:21:33 PM PST by
FrankR
(The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
To: SteveH
It could be a setup. Springer appeals to the lowbrow Well, Pissant watches him...
27 posted on
02/25/2011 3:57:42 PM PST by
Hardraade
(I want gigaton warheads now!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson