Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48

I would presume that the idea is to get the state and the cities out of the power business, which they had no business getting into in the first place.

The bill says that they should be sold in the best interests of the state. Presumably that means a) get rid of costly facilities; and b) get the best price for them.

Presumably the wording is intended to avoid costly and time-consuming bidding processes, which can go on for years. As long as the properties are put up for sale in such a way that they get the best reasonable bids for them, that should suffice.

That’s just my guess. But often the “bidding process” can be time consuming, wasteful, and actually end up not getting the highest bids anyway. Better to put someone responsible in charge and let him use his best judgment.


3 posted on 02/21/2011 7:14:01 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
That’s just my guess. But often the “bidding process” can be time consuming, wasteful, and actually end up not getting the highest bids anyway. Better to put someone responsible in charge and let him use his best judgment.

Agree. Was this a qualified versus high bid? There is an important distinction that the majority do not understand. I would take the qualified.
25 posted on 02/21/2011 11:51:43 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media. There are Wars and Rumors of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson