Your assumptions speak volumes. You challenged creation science as not being true science, in response I posted a link for you to educate yourself. Instead you continue to act as some sort of authority while doing nothing but throwing stones.
Guess what? If you’re so sure of your position there may be a million dollars in it for you - course you need some credentials of someone else with credentials to help back up your position. The problem is you have not spent anytime investigating the problems involved w/ long ages macro-evolution.
Correction
some credentials
or [not of]
someone else with credentials
“You challenged creation science as not being true science”
I’m sorry I wasn’t clear. I do not challenge “creation science”. I wholly dismiss it as the fraud that it is.
“Guess what? If you’re so sure of your position there may be a million dollars in it for you”
No sane person would actually pit the scientific body of knowledge against the fabrication of “creation science” for money.
“The problem is you have not spent anytime investigating the problems involved w/ long ages macro-evolution.”
There are lots of problems with evolutionary theories. Actually there are lots of problems with many theories on many scientific topics.
I was recently reading about gravitational anomalies - “creation science” would extrapolate that to be “Newton is a liar” and to deny gravity exists because there are “problems with the theory of Gravity”.
In other words, you are asking that “creation science” to be compared on equal footing with giants of science that created the best understanding possible of the world around us that man can provide over thousands of years of effort.
If there were any discoveries of scientific note, they’d be part of the scientific body of knowledge.