[edge919]

In the twelve Obama eligibility appeals to reach the Supreme Court of the United States, lawyers representing Obama or the US government attorneys operating on Obama’s behalf have submitted ZERO briefs in opposition to the requests for Petitions of Writ of Certiorari on behalf of appellants who have challeged Obama’s natural born citizen status.

I don't know this to be true or not. Do you have links to the filings in all 12 cases?? IIUC, not all these cases named Obama directly. Some involves either Secretaries of State or elections officials in particular states. And what's your point. None of this changes the fact that Obama still has no evidence to show that he didn't remain an Indonesian citizen up through adulthood?? Are Obama's lawyers supposed to file something they don't have??

[jamese777]

I don’t know this to be true or not. Do you have links to the filings in all 12 cases?? IIUC, not all these cases named Obama directly. Some involves either Secretaries of State or elections officials in particular states. And what’s your point. None of this changes the fact that Obama still has no evidence to show that he didn’t remain an Indonesian citizen up through adulthood?? Are Obama’s lawyers supposed to file something they don’t have??

---

You can “google” any of them: Berg v Obama, Beverly v FEC,
Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Herbert v Obama, Hollister v Soetoro, Kerchner v Obama, Lightfoot v Bowen, Rhodes v MacDonald, Schneller v Cortes, Taitz v Obama, Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz.

My point is that Obama hasn’t needed any evidence. When any Supreme Court Justice is considering granting “cert” they request (which means order)the appellee to file a response to what the appellants are charging. Thus far, no Justice has requested a response to an Obama-related eligibility appeal at the Supreme Court.