No, the homosexual agenda is the enemy, and anyone who practices homosexuality is part of that agenda. Homosexuality is not compatible with conservatism, any more than being anti-gun, pro-open borders, pro-abortion, pro-tax and spend, or weak on national defense is compatible. You could no sooner have a conservative homosexual than you could have a pet cat-dog, or have a tub full of hot-cold water.
And yes, recognizing homosexuality in any form as a legitimate lifestyle choice, be it individually or the whole circle jerk, is surrendering.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
I am outnumbered. Either you people think I am accepting a gay agenda, or you are exactly what I’ve complained about on other threads: completely prejudiced against people who are homosexual, to the point where you wouldn’t want their vote.
In your comments, you said things like you would never want to rent to homosexuals, they are all obscene, they hate G-d, they are perverted, they really don’t exist outside of media pandering, having one in our tent IS pandering to their agenda, recognizing homosexuality is wrong, etc.
Believe what you want to believe. Pretend the sky is green in your world. But what do you think Dick Cheney feels about all this? He watched his precious child, a tomboy, find herself as a teen attracted to girls. He knows that homosexuality exists and that the ORIENTATION is not a choice, and that for someone with a homosexual orientation to force himself to love the opposite sex is VERY DIFFICULT, probably akin to you forcing yourself to love someone of the same sex. I am not saying it can’t be done.
I’d like to see the people of FR condemn gay GROUPS, gay agendas, gay marriage, but have loving G-dly kindness toward people with this affliction. Especially the innocent, very young ones. I bet many FReepers have friends or relatives with children who are homosexual and they know that the child didn’t want it any more than another child wanted Tourette’s.