What fossil? The one that was analyzed in the paper submitted to Science. Your under no obligation to agree with their conclusions but denying it´s existence is poor strategy if you want to convince the fair and open minded.
FOUL, your presupposition is that this bone exists so there fore it is a valid fossil link. Just because someone assigns the meaning of a bone as a linked fossil doesnt mean it is connected. We all know the stretch that the scientific community has tried to make over decades to prove their pet theory, it just hasn’t worked. That just isnt fair and open minded of you.