I’ve read that stuff before and it has no basis in physics. The assumptions are baseless and cannot be verified, and it has no consistent mathematical basis.
Ha - in my post 42 I reference creationscience.com where Dr. Brown who worked as an evolutionary scientist found major problems with long-ages and macro-evolution.
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
Written by Dr. Walt Brown Ph.D. who explains the physics of his hydroplate theory and shows the mathematical formulas. His latest 8th edition has increased over 100 pages so you may need to part w/ approx $30 in order to get all the details but the online book resource describes how all of the puzzle pieces in archeology, geography and astronomy fit together to explain a wide range of purplexing problems found within many scientific disciplines.
If you were to read it, you might then begin reconsidering how much trust you are placing in modern-day science that can not explain sea fossils on top of all mountain ranges, why the mid-oceanic trench circumnavigates the globe in parallel with all the major mountain ranges, the physics required for bending, and folding granite rock formations, formation of salt dome, etc.
The list simply combines all the major facets of science to explain how all of the jigsaw puzzle pieces fit together. But you would need to set aside all of your prejudices for the conjectures of modern-day science. Are you not aware that plate tectonics has major flaws that are simply unanswerable?