Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

” the courts have never ruled on what constitutes a” natural born citizen”

The Supreme court has never specially addressed a case that was based solely on the meaning of Natural born.
BUT......

The Supreme court has defined the meaning of Natural Born a number of time.
for example: Minor vs Happensett
CHILDREN WHOM PARENTS ARE U.S CITIZENS ARE CONSIDERED NATURAL BORN. Parent(s) means both of them!!


83 posted on 01/21/2011 11:09:50 AM PST by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: omegadawn
That's not the issue. And you are wrong. Check out United States v. Wong Kim Ark
87 posted on 01/21/2011 11:17:53 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson