[SunkenCiv]

[ottbmare]

Total nonsense. John Gray was and is right.

[GOP_Party_Animal]

Half of the subjects were female (6 heterosexual and 6 homosexual) and half were male (6 heterosexual and 6 homosexual).

Why, yes, that is the exact mixture in the at-large population! And 24 people - such a huge sample size too! What GREAT research! /heavy sarc

[Nonstatist]

Professor Zeki said: “Passionate romantic love is commonly triggered by a visual input and is an all-consuming and disorienting state.

And it's the same in men and women, Zeki? You ever been on a date, douche bag?

[Cicero]

Jerks. “Scientific research” funded by the former Labour Government, no doubt. All too many scientists find what they set out to find—especially these days, when research grants only support politically correct answers.

[ransomnote]

The march of socialist ideology - there is no difference between men and women. Personally, I find the differences intriguing. Viva La Difference!

[Stepan12]

Homosexual desire is rooted in pathology. It is not the same as heterosexual love or desire.

It seems the spirit of East Anglia; i.e., the global warming scam, has metasasized to other so-called scientific inquiry as well.

[Psycho_Bunny]

"But new scientific research shows we actually act very similarly when we are in love"

LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!

Our brains may be firing similarly, but men and woman behave fairly differently.

And in the context of how our brains function "similarly" means what? A 10% difference? 25%? Even if it's 3%, that's huge, in biological terms - massive.

This whole article is a crapcrock.

[ThisLittleLightofMine]

Title misleading, lust is lust. Anyone who is married knows we think, act and communicate completely different. Which is challenging to marriage but also complementary.

[FatherofFive]

There are a few differences.

[GOP Poet]

bookmark

[Mariner]

I don't care what their research says.

Everyone knows the Venus/Mars analogy is true innately.

It was known to the Greeks when they named their gods/planets.