1 posted on
01/06/2011 1:54:10 PM PST by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: decimon
They probably wore stupid blue and orange UF Gator colors. What a waste of money “study.”
2 posted on
01/06/2011 1:55:06 PM PST by
Frantzie
(Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
To: SunkenCiv
3 posted on
01/06/2011 1:55:21 PM PST by
decimon
To: decimon
Well....yeah. It got cold and there’s such a thing as shrinkage. Even the cave men got it. :)
4 posted on
01/06/2011 1:55:36 PM PST by
lovecraft
(Specialization is for insects.)
To: decimon
5 posted on
01/06/2011 1:58:05 PM PST by
Leo Farnsworth
(I'm not really Leo Farnsworth.)
To: decimon
, meaning humans spent a considerable amount of time without body hair and without clothing, 
I guess this guy didn't get the memo.
6 posted on
01/06/2011 1:58:15 PM PST by
dragonblustar
("... and if you disagree with me, then you sir, are worse than Hitler!" - Greg Gutfeld)
To: decimon
We know that the Flintstones wore clothes.
To: decimon
No way in the world to figure that out from lice DNA
8 posted on
01/06/2011 1:58:40 PM PST by
GeronL
(How DARE you have an opinion!!)
To: decimon
My own careful research also confirms these important findings.
10 posted on
01/06/2011 2:00:35 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(Character is defined by how we treat those who society says have no value.)
To: decimon
Can they use DNA to determine when politicians branched off from the rest of the louse genus?
13 posted on
01/06/2011 2:04:44 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
To: decimon
What about the migration of Homo Erectus some 500,000+ years ago? Peking and the South Urals must have been chilly?
14 posted on
01/06/2011 2:04:54 PM PST by
JimSEA
To: decimon
I could not find mention of lice in the pubic hair. Did I miss that important fact?
17 posted on
01/06/2011 2:13:13 PM PST by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: decimon
“Humans” using the term very loosely.
18 posted on
01/06/2011 2:13:41 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: decimon
DNA test confirms link to Lauren Empire.
19 posted on
01/06/2011 2:16:08 PM PST by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: decimon
You bet we did. And I still have that same pair of jeans.
To: decimon
“Because they are so well adapted to clothing, we know that body lice or clothing lice almost certainly didn’t exist until clothing came about in humans.” "Spontaneous Generation"?
27 posted on
01/06/2011 2:33:43 PM PST by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: decimon
" .. we know that body lice or clothing lice almost certainly didn’t exist until clothing came about in humans.” Stopped right there.
Moog put on a bear skin and .... lice magically appeared?
28 posted on
01/06/2011 2:36:03 PM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: decimon
To: decimon
You might say they dice the lice to find genes for jeans? Or an overhaul of the overall theory? Or perhaps skirting the issue of how the cavemen were kilt?
36 posted on
01/06/2011 2:47:45 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: decimon
So I guess that this was after the fall.
To: decimon
UF study of lice DNA shows humans first wore clothes made in Chinese sweatshops 170,000 years ago
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
