Well, give us a hint.
Listen to the interview and you will know. The media as a whole is frightened of one thing about this story being covered. It is gaining steam.
Basically, the interview is regarding the Birth Certificate.
Kuhner claims sources in both the Democrat Party and Liberal Media believe that “where there’s smoke there’s fire” and that SOMETHING is hidden in Obama’s records, be it that his birth religion is listed as Muslim, or that he may have applied for foreign aid as a student or something.
They they go on to discuss the possibility that, if Obama’s BC indicates that he was NOT born in America, African Americans and Liberals would be willing to go to war over the Constitutional crisis that would result. Which is dumb, because liberals don’t own guns and African Americans don’t know how to hold them properly.
While I’m certain there’s something in Obama’s BC - probably that his religion is listed as Muslim - I just can’t believe that the Democrats would be so inept and stupid as to run an ineligible candidate for President and just hope they could hide it forever. No way, they’re too devious and underhanded to do that, it just doesn’t make sense.
One thing about the interview that bugs me though, off the top, they rip Obama for only referencing “The birth of a child who dedicated his life to peace and teaching and whatever” in his Christmas address, and play one of Reagan’s addresses. But then, Reagan’s only reference to Jesus is “Christmas means so much, because of one special child” and, following the interview, Malzberg IMMEDIATELY states that “He says Jesus” which is a bald-faced lie.
Obama is almost certainly an atheist, who uses christianity to try to buy votes in a cynical and underhanded way, and Reagan’s ability to connect shines through, Malzberg doesn’t need to lie about what Reagan says to make his point. Just play the speeches one after the other and let the people see who is Presidential and who isn’t.