Would the different father actually make him ineligible? I doubt it. The Supreme Court would probably rule that the 14th Amendment would make him eligible (If he was actually born in America) as it would extend the ability to pass “Natural Born” citizenship to mothers as well as fathers.
This is a supreme court that could find abortion rights somewhere in the privacy clause, for God’s sake.
If the case is: Different father, different name since birth, no record of legal name change to BHO. Living under an assumed name? Could anyone else be eligible to be president with this much fraud in their history?
Once again, we’re clouding the issue of natural born citizen and born on American soil.
But then again, how can we speculate until we know the truth here.
Taken as what we know, his father was Kenyan, his mother not old enough to convey natural born citizenship to her son, he’s not naturally born. He is and was ineligible to run or be president. Period.
This has got NOTHING to do with any BC.
Besides that, anything else in the interview regarding the other documents that are being hidden from us?
Actually, if the father were different it would probably MAKE him eligible. Figuring that momma kept pretty close to home.
I just dont get it though. There has to be some clerk in the office in HI that has access to this information, and that could have sold it for whatever they would have lost in a pension.
Its like the UFO stuff—I just don’t think a “cover up” of that magnitude could happen if there were THAT many people involved.
If there is anything wrong with the BC, it would not disqualify him—just make momma out to look like, well.....I don’t call anyone’s mother that name.
“The Supreme Court would probably rule that the 14th Amendment would make him eligible....”
The Constitution uses the terms ‘citizen’ and ‘natural born citizen.’ In fact, both terms are used in the clause defining citizenship requirements for president: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President....” On the other hand, Amendment 14 uses only the term ‘citizen.’
It is clear that the Founders used two different terms because they were referring to two different types of citizenship, with natural-born citizenship being of a higher quality of citizenship necessary to be eligible for the presidency. Amendment 14 defines only who is a citizen; it is mute on the topic of natural-born citizen.
Any court that tries to define natural-born citizen as citizen will be committing an act of war on the people of the United States. However, I regard the refusal of any court to take the case of Soetoro’s eligibilty as a legal blockade, which is also an act of war against the people of the United States.
Who will enforce our Constitution when the executive, legislative, and judicial branches are corruptly conspiring to wage war against us?