Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan

I would think it would work the other way around.

Othewise, we would have had a runaway move into one extreme or the other by now.


25 posted on 12/26/2010 11:23:41 AM PST by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan
I would think it would work the other way around. Othewise, we would have had a runaway move into one extreme or the other by now.

Hot water can't keep as much gas in solution, thus colder water equals more trapped CO2 and warmer equals more released CO2.

This is not disputed by the AGW crowd. In fact, they trumpet the fact that the warmer seas will release CO2 and create a runaway effect. What they don't explain is why this hasn't already happened in one direction or another during the Earth's long history and how it could possibly come back from one extreme.

This is truly the stake through the heart of AGW. If CO2 was a driver, the oceans would ensure that CO2 would go to one extreme and stay there.

32 posted on 12/26/2010 1:09:15 PM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson