Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts

I ask that question of myself and others for this reason: If God could create a man that, even though he was only a day old, he appeared in every way to be a full grown man (and all of the previous development time that would cause one to infer), why could he not create a planet that, the day after it was created it appeared to be “fully developed” (and all the previous development time that would cause one to infer).

OTOH, I think our current world really IS best explained by the movie “the matrix”. Think about it. Matter does not really exist. It is just “coagulated energy”. It is merely perceived to exist in the form we “see and touch” it.

IOW, I feel like we are basically the equivalent of a bunch of first graders, after our first exposure to a teacher telling us those points of light in the night sky are just suns a long way away, trying to explain everything.

We don’t know what we don’t know by so many orders of magnitude that these discussions sometimes actually make me laugh out loud. I’m not so much impressed with what we know as I am with so much that we DON’T know.


95 posted on 01/19/2011 9:28:14 AM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy
I ask that question of myself and others for this reason: If God could create a man that, even though he was only a day old, he appeared in every way to be a full grown man (and all of the previous development time that would cause one to infer), why could he not create a planet that, the day after it was created it appeared to be “fully developed” (and all the previous development time that would cause one to infer). OTOH, I think our current world really IS best explained by the movie “the matrix”. Think about it. Matter does not really exist. It is just “coagulated energy”. It is merely perceived to exist in the form we “see and touch” it. IOW, I feel like we are basically the equivalent of a bunch of first graders, after our first exposure to a teacher telling us those points of light in the night sky are just suns a long way away, trying to explain everything. We don’t know what we don’t know by so many orders of magnitude that these discussions sometimes actually make me laugh out loud. I’m not so much impressed with what we know as I am with so much that we DON’T know

Ah. Interesting that I so noted the point of what I could not know with the information given, specifically in regard to the age a full grown Adam.

The claims are not over what God 'could' do, they are statements of FACT called theories or religious doctrines explaining what God did or did not do which are against what He elected/predestined some to put into writing.

Genesis 1:2 is probably the most overlooked, and least understood verse in the whole of the WORD. It says there was an event wherein this earth was made inhabitable after a 'time' declared in Genesis 1:1.

Genesis 1:2 says there was a flood and Peter affirms this as another witness in IIPeter 3. Now some claim they hold Peter's keys, but they willingly ignore what Peter's keys unlock. What Peter got were keys that Peter put into writing it was not a locksmith business that evolves as politically correct pressures require a new set of keys.

Yes, absolutely God could do anything He decides. But to ignore what He said He did is called 'sottish' by Him.

96 posted on 01/19/2011 11:48:42 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson