I believe in religion in the sense I believe it exists and has many interesting stories. I believe in science in that it exists and has many interesting theories. I believe the theories when the preponderance of the evidence indicates they are most likely true. Perhaps rather than say I believe in science, we who do should say “I believe scientific evidence” when there is enough of it and it is reproducible. Unfortunately religion has little reproducible evidence, which is why it is not science.
Perhaps rather than say I believe in science, we who do
***right there, you acknowledge that you DO...
should say “I believe scientific evidence” when there is enough of it and it is reproducible.
***Then why do I encounter so much vehemence against the historicity of Jesus’s claim that caused men to kill Him? Each time I have logged onto creat threads I have seen this irrational mode coming from the evo crowd. It seems to bother them quite a bit when there is rational evidence presented for the historicity of Christ and the claims He made for Himself. Even his ENEMIES acknowledge such claims, but many evolutionist types here on FR put less credence in that historical evidence than they do about something that happened billions of years ago.
Unfortunately religion has little reproducible evidence, which is why it is not science.
***Then if something isn’t reproducible, it isn’t science. The past is not reproducible.