fyi
Are you pinging me to comment on this nonsense so I can be zotted? I find the science of evolution to be generally convincing so zot away.
1) The myth of evolution between different species as an attempt to explain how living things got here. (Just a note: This is what I mean by evolution here - I'm not talking about evolution within a species like breeding dogs or cats to look different over time.)
2) The attempt by some on this thread to mutually exclude true science and the Bible or the Christian faith.
My Comment: The myth of evolution between species has no evidence and is contrary to the laws of (true) science some of which is pointed out here. The best refutation of evolution is intelligent design which is everywhere, evidence more numerous than the sand of the sea. True science supports and is the friend of God's Word, the Bible. You don't, however, have to be a scientist to know that everything is intricately made with purpose thus pointing to a purposeful and intelligent maker - little kids even know that. That's why Romans 1:20 says that living things so obviously point to a God of intelligence and purpose and authority that naysayers have no excuse.
3) Libertarians v. conservatives: I’m an economic libertarian but a political constitutional Christian conservative. In that sense you might say I’m both, at least generally, but not specifically. I am a conservative politically, not a libertarian. But economically, I’m pretty much an absolute libertarian and wish we had a hundred more Milton Freidmans running around (strictly economically speaking only).