There is enough info out there on Black Light’s fraudulent claims if you look. I didn’t have any trouble finding info.
***Then by all means, post it since you’ve already found it.
Equating these guys with Einstein is a little far fetched don’t you think? LOL
***Not if they turn out to be right. I consider them to be one group within the LANR community which now have quite a bit of evidence piling up with their claims. I have already made money by relying on such claims and I’d love to challenge naysayers such as yourself to put your money where your mouth is — as big as it is.
How I Made Money from Cold Fusion
Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ views
Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts
The Suppression of Inconvenient Facts in Physics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2266921/posts
Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:50:26 PM · by Kevmo · 78 replies · 1,626+ views Suppressed Science.Net ^ | 12/06/08 | http://www.suppressedscience.net/
The End of Snide Remarks Against Cold Fusion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts
Friday, June 05, 2009 5:56:08 PM · by Kevmo · 95 replies · 1,770+ views
Free Republic, Gravitronics.net and Intrade ^ | 6/5/09 | kevmo, et al
‘Cold Fusion’ Rebirth? New Evidence For Existence Of Controversial Energy Source
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212864/posts
Monday, March 23, 2009 12:42:14 PM · by FlameThrower · 35 replies · 1,586+ views
Science Daily ^ | Mar. 23, 2009 | American Chemical Society
Look my Friend, it’s up to you to support this claim, not me to disprove it. So far, all you’ve been doing is attacking other posters and falsely equating this research with other totally unrelated fields of research. Making comparisons to hot fusion research and Einstein does nothing to prove your case. If these results can’t be independently verified (and they haven’t) they don’t belong in a scientific discussion. Note that the so called independent verification in both cases, 2008 and in the article posted here, came from within the faculty at the University Black Light is associated with and from a former colleague who has a vested interest in the research. That’s not independent.