PALIN leads Ohio and Wisconsin Rep. Primaries

PPP | PPP

[Anamnesis]

Ohio: Palin 21% Huckabee 19% Gingrich 18% Romney 15% Paul 6% Daniels 5% Pawlenty 3% Thune 2%

Wisconsin: Palin 21% Huckabee 18% Romney 17% Gingrich 13% Pawlenty 10% Paul 4% Thune 3% Daniels 2%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_OH_1216.pdf

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_WI_1216.pdf

[ansel12]

You can’t just keep plucking stray words and attaching some unknown significance to them, you have to show me the actual post and give me the link, I have no idea who I am quoting there or why, or what about, or responding to or anything.

To get back to something related to the thread and this election, why do you prefer Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani over Palin in 2012?

[FTJM]

LOL, you can’t even follow the thread, that made no sense.

[FTJM]

More deflecting, more trolling...

Tell us more about the draft and how it is slavery.

[ansel12]

Of course it made sense.

You prefer Rudy Giuliani, or Mitt Romney, or Jim Demint, or Pence, to win the 2012 nomination for the presidency, instead of Governor Palin.

That is why you are on this thread, and so many of the other Palin threads, working against her, and her freerepublic conservative support.

[ansel12]

I don’t think that you understand what trolling is, a conservative being on a Palin thread defending Palin is not “trolling”. Trolling is not disagreeing with a troll that thinks that Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are better choices than the conservative choice of Governor Palin.

Getting on Palin threads to cause trouble, hijack them, attack the thread posters, attack Sarah Palin, that is the stuff that comes under trolling.

Remember that a lot of Palin attackers, Giuliani supporters, Romney supporters, and anti-social conservatives have been labelled trolls, and banned.

One way to draw that label, is to do the kind of thing that you are doing on this thread about Governor Palin leading in Ohio and Wisconsin.

Sarah Palin IS this Tea Partier’s cup of Tea!!
12/02/2009 | Jim Robinson

Posted on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:02:15 PM by Jim Robinson
Being as how I’m a God, Country, Family, small government, traditional American values, Life & Liberty patriotic kind of guy, Sarah Palin IS my cup of tea. My cup runneth over!
I pray she runs.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2398680/posts

[FTJM]

I thought I saw something like that earlier from you, that wasn't about them adopting 100 year old razors for hygiene, it was about why they prefer them to a knife, and what techniques they use when employing them, and why it is effective from their perspective, that is interesting and useful knowledge to rough men.

Ok, transvestites and their preference for razors over knives... if you say so. LOL, you're not helping yourself.

[FTJM]

No it didn’t, and if anything I am working against hypocrites like you who support RINOs and post obscene comments a liberal would be proud of on FR while pretending to be a conservative.

[ansel12]

I'm not the naive kid with little experience in life and the world, that is your burden.

Can you tell what a post like this is supposed to mean to you, do you remember who was left in 2/2/08? You never posted the link like I asked, but I found it anyway.

To: Berlin_Freeper
“they would rather have victory than total litmus test purity,”

I’m afraid the conservative purity boat sailed a long time ago, it’s everyman for himself now.
MAN THE LIFEBOATS!
4 posted on Saturday, February 02, 2008 2:22:43 PM by ansel12

[ansel12]

For a guy that is not a social conservative, and that prefers Romney and Giuliani both, to Governor Palin, you sure are judgemental and sensitive about people's non-political lives, you seem obsessed with mine as you drag it around from thread to thread. Normally I would find your puppy like interest in my personal life flattering (except for the sex stuff, you are creeping me out with that obsession), but I recognize that you use it to hijack Palin threads like trolls do.

At this very moment, you want this man to be President instead of Sarah Palin, does he titillate something in your sheltered imagination?

You support a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, anti-gun, anti-social conservative for President over Sarah Palin, but you get your panties all bound up around some man talk that you see in someone's posting history?

Actual photo of your man
for President.

[FTJM]

You aren't conservative and you do nothing more than spam, troll and attack, like a poodle yelping at everyone, with no discernable intelligence or intellectual honesty. I get that you want anyone who disagrees with you to be banned, in your strange fascistic attempt to quiet any dissent or reason. That is painfully obvious. What I don't get is the incredible lack of comprehension or logic that you exhibit, it is truly remarkable. And like I said, you trolled this site for almost a month attacking Chuck DeVore in favor of Fiorina, using the same M.O you use daily.

My first post on THIS THREAD WAS A POLL FROM THE SAME ORGANIZATION AS THE OP. It wasn't an attack on anyone. It was simply a link to the thread with the poll and the acronym of OTOH. I'm going to repeat this one more time in the slim hope that somewhere in your cranium a spark happens and the synapses connect. I posted the thread to the PPP Poll as a counter to the OP's PPP poll to show how Palin supporters extol PPP polls where she is winning as great news from a legitimate organization, and denounce PPP polls where she is losing as an evil liberal agenda and anyone who posts one is a liberal troll. You and your trolling pal, proved the point perfectly and right on cue. In other words, the PPP polls are either consistently useable or not, it's NOT dependent on whether the outcome is favorable to you. This is a simple concept, yet this was and is COMPLETELY LOST ON YOU.

What else is lost on you, is that you posted a quote that includes the words "traditional American values" yet you post about prostitutes, trannies, pimps, hare krishnas etc... ON THIS SITE. Not only do you post about them, you defend your comments time and again, never disavowing, and if anyone criticizes you for it, you cry that you are being personally attacked. When it suits you though, you lie about your previous comments and deny that you ever made them, i.e. saying that you fought the draft because it was slavery. And you have the temerity to call someone else a liberal! It is truly mind boggling.

[FTJM]

There you go again, claiming that your degenerate life style is good life experience on a conservative website. You really don't get it.

Of course I remember what was left, my comments were based on that and I have pointed out to you the relevance of that comment to your actions in supporting Huckabee and demanding your own test, which is flawed at best.

You don't understand what you are typing. You are responding for the sake of responding.

[ansel12]

How does a true conservative rank Sarah Palin on this list, as their choice for president? First, second, third?

Rudy Giuliani

Mitt Romney

Sarah Palin

[FTJM]

At this very moment, you want this man to be President instead of Sarah Palin, does he titillate something in your sheltered imagination?

Ah, another lie. You can't help yourself. And you've resorted to what amounts to name calling. You might want to check those site rules again. Remember when you went crying to the mods tough guy? Lol...

"some man talk that you see in someone's posting history?"

Wow, there you go again, defending your comments bragging about your experience with trannies and prostitutes as "man talk" on a conservative website while claiming to be a social conservative.

Please by all means though, keep hanging yourself.

[FTJM]

I have told you many many times, to the point of exhaustion, IMO, she isn't a true conservative and I have backed it up with facts. Get it? Wait, I know you don't. I've also have been clear that I would vote for her if she won the nomination. I won't support either Romney or Giuliani or your guy Huckabee, and I would rank her first as a social conservative.

[ansel12]

With your politics, you rank Palin third, I assume that Romney is second, and Giuliani is first on this list, as it is in your posts.

Rudy Giuliani

Mitt Romney

Sarah Palin

How do you get that as “conservative”? Also, of course Palin is the best social conservative, anyone that is not a social conservative is not a true conservative, period.

[FTJM]

You asked, I answered. Now you've resorted to fabrication to prove your point. Shame.

[ansel12]

You never answer, you just say something about something else and lie by claiming you have answered. Frankly you don’t want to do politics at all, your desire is to merely troll Palin threads.

This post is accurate, and you disagreed with none of it, and you refuse to respond to the end question and statement.

With your politics, you rank Palin third, I assume that Romney is second, and Giuliani is first on this list, as it is in your posts.

Rudy Giuliani

Mitt Romney

Sarah Palin

How do you get that as “conservative”? Also, of course Palin is the best social conservative, anyone that is not a social conservative is not a true conservative, period.

[FTJM]

You have resulted to making up posts now. And why would I answer a question based on your lie?

I disagreed with none of it? I called it a FABRICATION!

Why and how are you even allowed on a computer is astonishing. I'd be shocked if you didn't have to wear a helmet 24/7.

[ansel12]

Nothing is made up. You do prefer both Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani over Sarah Palin, and you are not a social conservative.

That means you are not conservative, and it shows why you troll Palin threads like this with nothing to contribute except troll nonsense and to hijack them.

[FTJM]

You fabricated a comment on this thread about my views and then cry troll nonsense...man, you really take the cake.

FYI, you're back to your OCD spamming again... it's probably time to take your meds.