LOL!
They are convenient props for his sagging ratings. Now they want to USE the kids to show a HAPPY family and it’s backfiring. Also their dog BO (Barack Obama) looks like he/she is the only one having fun when it’s convenient to bring the dog out for the HAPPYfmaily photo ops.
How comeSarah Palin’s kids aren’t OFF LIMITS or better yet, the Bush girls certainly weren’t OFF LIMITS.
True. But just because Jack jumped off the bridge, doesn't mean 'we' have to.
They have nothing to do with our national problems, and when/where their parents want/don't want them to be photographed is none of my business.
I find the pictures of these 'family' events interesting (as in boring humor), but I don't believe that these two young and beautiful ladies deserve the blame for that.
I think most Freepers have generally had a cavalier attitude about pictures of the girls anyway. So I guess I'm really just preaching to the choir.
I know what you meant by your comment. Obama isn't the one who decided his children should be off limits, that was the media. They did it for Clinton as well. THEY are the reason Sarah's children are attacked.
I hope that's a good answer for your rhetorical question.