Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: unixman9627

Did a search on the word “slave” and “slavery” an found no occurrences. This probably disappoints the Neo Yankee statist found in the deep recesses of Free Republic.


2 posted on 12/14/2010 5:07:26 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
Deep recesses? The Lincoln-loving statists are pretty overt on this site. Damn them all.

Jeff Davis was a True American Hero. I am especially fond of these lines from Davis' second inaugural:

The experiment instituted by our revolutionary fathers, of a voluntary Union of sovereign States for the purposes specified in a solemn compact, and been perverted by those who, feeling power and forgetting right, were determined to respect no law but their own will. The Government had ceased to answer the ends for which it was ordained and established. To save ourselves from a revolution which, in its silent but rapid progress, was about to place us under the despotism of numbers, and to preserve in spirit, as well as in form, a system of government we believed to be peculiarly fitted to our condition, and full of promise for mankind, we determined to make a new association, composed of States homogenous in interest, in policy, and in feeling.

This makes me shiver. "To save ourselves from a revolution... we determined to make a new association." Nothing more American than that.

4 posted on 12/14/2010 5:48:36 PM PST by upstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
Did a search on the word “slave” and “slavery” an found no occurrences. This probably disappoints the Neo Yankee statist found in the deep recesses of Free Republic.

Read his farewell to the Senate and his first message to the confederate congress. Jeff's back on the slave track with both of those.

13 posted on 12/14/2010 6:55:11 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

neo yankee = American


26 posted on 12/14/2010 8:01:14 PM PST by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

Still living in 1865 aren’t you? You lost, remember?


39 posted on 12/15/2010 3:44:12 PM PST by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
Did a search on the word “slave” and “slavery” an found no occurrences. This probably disappoints the Neo Yankee statist found in the deep recesses of Free Republic.

Ah, but he did -- just not directly: "They formed a new alliance, but within each State its government has remained, the rights of person and property have not been disturbed." (emphasis mine)

There was really only one type of "property" at issue, of course.

And: "Through many years of controversy with our late associates, the Northern States" -- about slavery, of course.

And: "With a Constitution differing only from that of our fathers in so far as it is explanatory of their well-known intent, freed from the sectional conflicts which have interfered with the pursuit of the general welfare..."

The sectional conflicts were about slavery. And the the Confederate constitution primarily differed from "that of our fathers" by specifically protecting the right to own slaves.

And: "The cultivation of our fields has progressed as heretofore, and even should we be involved in war there would be no considerable diminution in the production of the staples which have constituted our exports and in which the commercial world has an interest scarcely less than our own. This common interest of the producer and consumer can only be interrupted by an exterior force which should obstruct its transmission to foreign markets..."

Davis is referring, of course, to cotton -- the production of which depended on slave labor. The south predicted that the abolition of slavery would result in "diminution in the production" of cotton, and the Confederacy hoped that the disruption to the "foreign markets" of England's textile industry, would result in British support for the Confederacy.

And: "We have changed the constituent parts, but not the system of our Government. The Constitution formed by our fathers is that of these Confederate States, in their exposition of it, and in the judicial construction it has received, we have a light which reveals its true meaning."

Again, one notes the changes pertaining to protection of slavery.

You might wish that Davis had said nothing about slavery -- but his speech is in fact suffused with the topic. He just was not honest enough to say it outright.

51 posted on 12/16/2010 12:12:26 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson