Yeah, I made a point of underlying the buzz-names, such as James Cameron. I mean, this book has too many leftist dingleberries dangling off of it to be worth much of anything. And it’s not as if attempts to rehabilitate the poor misunderstood inbred mass-murderess floozy haven’t been made before. Michael Grant makes an ass out of himself defending her by either ignoring or blowing by what she’s known to have done, and digging in his little heels regarding the surviving contemporary accounts, such as Herod’s complaint that within minutes of meeting him she suggested they dismiss their attendants so he could do her.
So I dont get it? Is this a book an attempt to somehow hang modern liberal women’s ideas on her like a champion? And an attempt to revise her legacy? Like she was not slutted out? I am confused.