Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ichabod1
Basically correct. However, England's most enlightened monarchs were those who inspired genuine respect and loyalty in their subjects, rather than ruling them by fear. This generally meant the local areas were ruled by barons and counts who did the same.

The best example is the legendary King Arthur (4th century), but Henry IV, Elizabeth I and Edward III all inspired genuine affection from the people whom they ruled. As pointed out in my previous post in the pre-Elizabethan Tudor's clan loss of territories, powerful rulers often translated into weakened countries.

Hmmmmm, we have more than a few modern examples of the same, don't we?

75 posted on 12/07/2010 10:36:10 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

Absolutely. Whether it’s taxes or coercion, if the government is on the producer’s back he’s going to either do as little as possible or escape. And, though I don’t know THAT much about life as a feudal serf, I’m pretty sure there were ways of getting back.


78 posted on 12/07/2010 11:46:31 AM PST by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson