Until we “man-up” and start prosecuting people for treason (think Johnny Lind Walker and Jane Fonda and this Manning freak), we will always be playing on defensive. My beloved country.
You have a usurper who gained power in a coup in 2008 thanks to a fall guy on our side and Soros. As long as he is in power - things will only get worse.
Wrong set of people:
1 - The President,
2 - The Congress,
3 - The Supreme Court.
Here’s why:
The President because of the whole fiasco concerning LTC Lankin [ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635498/posts ].
By subjecting the LTC to a Courts Martial, which is authorized/enacted by an executive order on the Manual for Court Martials, for questioning the legitimacy of orders is precisely that of allowing Obama to declare his own legitimacy and under that legitimacy subject him to trial. (i.e. it is, in effect, allowing Obama to be judge/jury in his own cause.)
Further, the ineligibility of Obama to be President would, if true, could render ALL foreign military actions/engagements to be illegitimate which, in turn, expose the soldiers overseas to charges of violating international law ratified by the US by treaty.
The continued allowance of having a president of questionable eligibility is therefore giving aid to the enemies of America.
The congress because of their allowance of the above. For the enactment, and enforcement of the GCA of 1968; the disarming/restriction of firearms to the people ACTIVELY inhibits them from responding to external threats under no such restrictions (ex. AZ vs. Mexican Gangs). For the refusal to seal the borders [see art 4 sec 4 of the US Constitution].
The USSC for degrading the Constitution.
The USSC has declared itself to be superior to the Constitution, and in so doing it has weakened the authority of the Supreme law of the land.
Example, in 1798’s Calder v. Bull the Supreme Court declared that the restriction against Ex Post Facto law was applicable only to criminal law [or law which could be prosecuted criminally]. {The Congress uses that as justification to make ex post facto tax law; which they claim to be ‘administrative’ or ‘regulatory’.} Yet violations of ex post facto tax law are prosecuted in criminal court. {And it is thus that the Constitution is made of none effect; if the Constitution is of none effect then how is that NOT the active act of “aid and comfort” to the enemies of the country whose supreme law is the Constitution [that is, America]?}
The same sort of undermining can be seen in more recent USSC decisions; the 2005 case of Kelo v. New London for example. In that case the Supreme Court ruled that larceny was a-ok should it be done with the government approval that is ‘eminent domain.’ {The 5th Amendment REQUIRES that eminent domain be “for public use” but in Kelo’s case it was being used to turn the land over to a private developer for the construction of some private business building, IIRC.}