Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 1010RD; Cronos; SunkenCiv; blam; All

I want to thank you for your detailed responses to this idea. Although I did study biological sciences, and worked as a lab tech in medical schools and at NIH, I did many years of other things. So now at 72 it feels a little unreal to think I could actually do something significant with this, so the encouragement is much appreciated. Now I will answer the specific points you raised. This will also help clarify my thinking.

First of all my theory is that there is at least a partial genetic basis for Alzheimers. Scientists have discovered some genes which they believe correlate with the occurance of Alzheimers (like they now identify breast cancer genes). My hypothesis is that, based on the detailed observation and care of my husband, such a gene may cause wandering bahavior that would benefit surviving blood relatives because there would be more available food, especially in winter or drought conditions. Thus the offspring bearing this gene would tend to pass it on and on. This behavior seemed to occur at a time when mobility and potential usefulness was coming to an end, but before real helplessness set in. This would be an optimum time in a primative setting for the person to cause their own death.

Secondly, in the realm of sociology, I have found that it is possible to set up conditions that make it possible for someone with Alzheimers to be a contributing member of the “tribe” past the time I have heard/read that most believe it is possible or practical. When my husband first became “difficult” and I looked into an insitutional placement, I was told it was over $50,000 a year and could go on for as much as 10 years. I ended up caring for him with minimal help and he died at home. Only the last 6 months was physically very hard as his body began to deteriorate rather rapidly. Fortunately, I was ten years younger, in good health, and physically strong.

1) I have made a great many other observations besides the ones I have mentioned here and have already written a lot of them down.

2) The additional research I have done was to look at aging research data from long settled relative urbanized areas in India and West Africa, and black people in Cleveland. I should do a lot more of this. Also, I would need to talk with others who have cared for Alz. people, especially in a family (tribal) setting to see if their observations tend to confirm mine.

3) I have outlined my hypotheses above. Need to think more about this whole issue.

4) Testing would involve much larger studies that I am not in a position to do. However, if I could interest professionals, I could certainly suggest some practical parameters for conducting some aspects. This might include genetic testing, familial observations and record keeping, more detailed studies on aging in homogenious populations from long settled well populated areas vs. the same on thin widely scattered populations like Laplander, Inuit, Kalahari Bushmen, etc.

5) Reporting findings could occur in several ways. I have already thought of writing something for the AARP magazine about my experience caring for my husband, including my observations and theory generated by caring for him. If not AARP, some other popular journal or blog dealing with aging, Alzheimers and dying. Where that might lead, who knows?

Regarding posting on FR, I wish they would not call original contributions “vanities”. Certainly some of the posts are, but I would call others “original observations” or “original writing”. At any rate, thank you again for your suggestions, and any others you may be inspired to add. Last thought re PhDs. BS = Bull Sxxx, MS = More of Same, PhD = Piled higher and Deeper. ;-)


41 posted on 11/14/2010 10:22:10 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
Maybe some ideas here:

The Neanderthal theory

The Neanderthal theory of autism, Asperger and ADHD

45 posted on 11/15/2010 6:08:50 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

Good job. So you would view it as a useful gene. Is it dominant or recessive? You’d also want to measure the onset of this “wandering off” behavior. Is it consistent across Alzheimer sufferers as you postulate? That would go a long way toward supporting your theory.

I would formalize your ideas and try to correspond with univeristy scientists studying Alzheimers as a genetic issue or sociologists trying to help manage the disease for caregivers like you’ve been.

I’d love to read more about how you managed with your husband. It is the practical that often leads to the scientific insight. AARP would be a great way to get the information out and your observations are worthy of that.

Please keep me posted and FReepmail me if you rather not discuss this in public.

I’d just get started doing it today. Why wait?


47 posted on 11/16/2010 3:28:23 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson