Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw

The birthers are out peddling their mis-representations of the Constitution again... sigh.

“Natural-born citizen” means citizen from time of birth.
Jindhal is that.

“The 14th Amendment has ZERO to do with it, fwiw.”
Wrong. 14th makes it clear that if you are born in the US, you are a citizen from birth. It ended second-class citizenship and de facto slavery. There is NO distinction between ANYONE born in the US, we are all EQUAL citizens.
The only ones excluded by Article II are naturalized citizens.

Is Jindal a naturalized citizen? NO. Citizen from birth, ergo eligible.

Your attempt to create a distinction is ANTI-14th-amendment, antithetical to the point of the amendment.
The Constitution trumps your opinion.

“I strongly doubt that if a freed black slave’s child ran for President that they would be considered natural born. May sound harsh,”

Not just harsh, but totally wrong.They would be eligible - as would ANYONE who was a citizen from birth.


93 posted on 11/12/2010 5:45:58 PM PST by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG

It hasn’t been argued and decided. Womg King Ark is a trump, like Miller is in gun law.


114 posted on 11/12/2010 5:57:27 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson