Look, you can make up your own views of what NBC *should* mean, but nowhere in US law does this exist ... “Natural born citizens only belong to or have one country and have no other.”
US law cite please.
And this is obviously wrong... “The subject about natural born citizens as there is no required law to make them citizens” ... since law DOES define who is a citizen at birth aka a natural born citizen. e.g. 14th amendment.
You know WOSG, you just don't know or want to admit that you are wrong. I've showed a series of posting on this thread ...all slam dunks, but you just go right on and deny what your "lying eyes" see.
And this is obviously wrong... “The subject about natural born citizens as there is no required law to make them citizens” ...
No, I'm right. There is no laws that naturalizes natural born citizens. There is no need to as that would be silly.
since law DOES define who is a citizen at birth aka a natural born citizen. e.g. 14th amendment.
You can look at post 232 as there are 14th Amendment citizens and they are NOT natural born citizens. Kawakita was NOT a natural born citizen, but just only a jus soli birth that only made him a citizen based on the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision.