“Whether or not that’s true, after the 14th amendment it’s moot point.”
That’s open to debate.
http://www.birthers.org/USC/14.html
Being ‘open to debate’ because some birthers are raising invalid objections to the standard and correct interpretation is a bit like saying the validity of capitalism is open to debate because there are some marxist profs out there.
Sure, but ... they’re wrong.
If you want to disprove the simple fact that “natural-born citizen” means something other than ‘citizenship at time of birth” show us the distinction in US law. You can’t.