Can YOU really be this stupid? A supreme court Justice gave a clear definition of natural-born citizen in a court decision. It was quoted - APPROVINGLY - in Wong Kim Ark.
and you cant even answer if you agree or disagree with it?!?
In United States v. Rhodes (1866), Mr. Justice Swayne, sitting in the Circuit Court, said:
“All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together.
Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.”
> “A supreme court Justice gave a clear definition of natural-born citizen in a court decision”
.
False. - he uttered conflicting words, probably in an enebriated state, that were in clear conflict with a previously given, and well reasoned definition.
> “It was quoted - APPROVINGLY - in Wong Kim Ark.”
.
False again. - Swayne’s words are nothing but idle commentary unrelated to the issue that was before the court, and thus irrelevant. He could have stated, with equal relevence, what he intended to have for lunch that day.
Your agenda is obviously deception and treason.
You attempt to dissolve legitimate constitutional protections against invaders in high office.