Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: YellowRoseofTx

“This subject has been discussed here out the wahzoo with reference to back up the argument. “

Yes, and some still don’t get how simple reality is. If you are a US citizen, you are either:
1) A citizen from birth, aka natural-born citizen
2) A naturalized citizen (via immigration process)
Everyone in category #1 is eligible to be President.

As per the 14th amendment, Jindhal is in #1. Thus he is eligible to be President.

There is no need for a complex falsehood when the truth is simple and clear.


100 posted on 11/12/2010 5:50:42 PM PST by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
Yes, and some still don’t get how simple reality is. If you are a US citizen, you are either: 1) A citizen from birth, aka natural-born citizen 2) A naturalized citizen (via immigration process) Everyone in category #1 is eligible to be President.

As per the 14th amendment, Jindhal is in #1. Thus he is eligible to be President.

Again, being born here does make one a "citizen", but not necessarily a "natural born citizen", that require both parents being citizens (either born here or naturalized) before the baby is natural born citizen.

And again, per the 14th amendment, Jinhal is not in #1 and is not eligible because his parents were not citizens at the time of his birth.

119 posted on 11/12/2010 6:00:50 PM PST by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: WOSG
yes, the truth is very simple & clear & you clearly do not know what you are talking about:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2626433/posts?page=299#299

A natural born person is one who owes NO allegiance to another nation at birth. The natural born has no choice to make as no nation can claim them as their own as the Brits could when obummer was born per the British Nationality Act of 1948 that obummer promoted via factless.org. And as the US Congress stated in 1868...dual allegiance was not the law although some “claimed” to hold it. They were ordered via US Law to immediately & formally renounce any foreign allegiance.

340 posted on 11/12/2010 10:35:11 PM PST by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson