Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The Comedian
Prove your extraordinary assertions. Produce a fact for a change.

We have video of a missile launch. Experts have agreed it is a missile. That is evidence. Only a fool would deny its existence. You on the other hand have a photo shopped blog page construction that has claimed at least two different planes now.

Personally posted an original observation to Freerepublic that proved 100 % that it was a vertical launched missile. Posted to at least 10 threads now. You apparently missed it every time. The physics of lighting. The right side of the plume is bright. The left side is dark. End of story. Was a mostly vertical launch arcing westward toward the sun setting below the horizon. 100 % proof. You cannot deny physics. It has no sense of humor. So the debate was over for me 2-3 weeks ago.

And I come back here because of some new additional evidence and still see foolish posts from people with their heads buried in the sand still denying any missile evidence. Even if there was a 10 % chance this was a missile, it must be investigated. Do you not care for your country ?

556 posted on 12/06/2010 9:10:34 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]


To: justa-hairyape
The right side of the plume is bright. The left side is dark.

Or it proves that the aircraft was coming from the southwest on a northeasterly heading while the sun was setting due west. So the sun would hit the north (right)side of the contrail, leaving the southern (left)side in the dark.

Which is exactly how the aircraft was supposedly heading! Surprise,surprise, surprise!

557 posted on 12/06/2010 9:21:46 AM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Alea Iacta Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson