Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/29/2010 2:27:03 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Dallas59

If there are no political ads on Mars, where can I sign up?


2 posted on 10/29/2010 2:29:06 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

By the time this thing is ready they could send smart robots.


3 posted on 10/29/2010 2:30:00 PM PDT by stumptalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Give them a World of Warcraft account and they won’t even notice they’re on Mars.


4 posted on 10/29/2010 2:30:32 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
DARPA has $1M to spend, plus another $100,000 from NASA itself

Which would probably buy just the toilet paper for a space mission. They are going to have to add a lot of zeros to those numbers to get anything like what is implied here.

6 posted on 10/29/2010 2:31:06 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

100 years to travel 35 million miles? It takes just a few months to get to Mars. I think they mean nearest star.


7 posted on 10/29/2010 2:31:15 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
for the program, which will initially develop a new kind of propulsion engine that will take us to Mars or beyond.

Whut?

If they were building a new super-secret propulsion system that could far surpass current chemical rocket designs, then it would take them about 1 week to get to Mars.

An "advanced" propulsion system that gives us the ability to make one-way trips to Mars? What are they talking about? Using squirrel farts so it takes 10x longer to get there?

9 posted on 10/29/2010 2:34:52 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Famed NASA Astronaut confirms Extraterrestrials are here


11 posted on 10/29/2010 2:36:44 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Can we send the DUmmies back to their home planet?


13 posted on 10/29/2010 2:37:40 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Heh, and they’re hiding space aliens in area 51. When friends asked me whether I knew where to find the aliens I always told them that the aliens were hidden along the Texas border. For some reason they took a long time to catch on that I wasn’t talking about space aliens.


14 posted on 10/29/2010 2:38:18 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

No offense, I think it probably won’t work. Too small of a group, one or two people die and there’s not enough expertise left. Too many people, greater the chances of personality clash and factions developing. Leading to deaths and we’re back to scenario one (not enough expertise left).


20 posted on 10/29/2010 2:43:38 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
Obama astronaut Pictures, Images and Photos

Is NASA open to candidate suggestions?

22 posted on 10/29/2010 2:44:43 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

They’re not going to get very far on $1.1 million.


23 posted on 10/29/2010 2:45:13 PM PDT by SouthTexas (WE are the Wave - Vote Nov 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
Since liberals are supposed to be smarter than us let's send all of them on the one way trip.
24 posted on 10/29/2010 2:45:35 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
Kind of disappointing realizing this wasn't about NASA covering up a 100-year-old spaceship.

That would have been a story!

26 posted on 10/29/2010 2:47:40 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Have these idiots ever heard of the moon? If you want to develop and test equipment to colonize another world, it makes sense to do it where you can rescue the test subjects if things go wrong. It’s also much easier to resupply them and change personell if needed.


29 posted on 10/29/2010 2:51:56 PM PDT by Hacklehead (Note to Leftists- We Will Bury You (politically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
The basic idea would have to be a search of the near stars for refugees from our ancient system. People living in our system just prior to the great catastrophes would not have known if anything here would remain habitable and there is abundant evidence that many of them tried to get out.

Other than that, we can get to Mars with current technology and you'd have to assume that if Germany had won WW-II, human feet would have been on Mars again no later than around 1990.

31 posted on 10/29/2010 2:56:05 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

“The 100-year ship would leave Earth with the intention of colonizing a planet, but it would likely be a one-way trip because of the time it takes to travel 35 million miles.”

Um, at only 1,000 mph, you can go 876,000,000 miles in 100 years. Wow “journalists” suck at math. Or at English. Or both.

Now, at “space shuttle” speed of about 17,500 mph, you’d go 15,330,000,000 miles in 100 years, or about 0.26% of a light year. The closest star is about 4 light years away, and the closest known exoplanet is about 10.5 light years away. Even ion engines used on exploratory satellites aren’t nearly fast enough to reach those, so yeah, they definitely need a faster engine than existing ones.

PS Incidentally, at “space shuttle” speed, you could reach Mars in about 5 months if you timed the launch properly with respect to the Earth’s and Mar’s orbits. Of course, the shuttle isn’t designed for that kind of trip.


33 posted on 10/29/2010 2:59:10 PM PDT by piytar (There is evil. There is no such thing as moderate evil. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Can we volunteer people for this one way mission..maybe like the entire cast of The View, Jersey Shore and the Daily Show?


36 posted on 10/29/2010 3:09:09 PM PDT by The Great RJ (The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

bump


38 posted on 10/29/2010 3:10:35 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

These long distance space travels have been considered since the 1950’s by scientists and science fiction writers. Gerard O’Neill was a big advocate of them, and I remember attending a lecture of his that included multi-generational travel. I asked if “technological atrophy” in the culture would be a problem, since folks on the ship don;t have ‘real’ jobs that push their mental limits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_K._O%27Neill


39 posted on 10/29/2010 3:12:34 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson