Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gilbo_3
they *should* be...but there are rare occassions of the hotter .223 being too much for the 5.56 innards...

Other way around...556 is too hot for 223.

52 posted on 10/21/2010 6:43:59 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Andonius_99

good catch Sir...more coffee needed i reckon...


55 posted on 10/21/2010 6:57:11 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Andonius_99; Gilbo_3; smokingfrog
There are two difference, powder and chamber leade.

5.56 NATO mil-spec uses a slightly faster powder. .223 chamber dimensions, where the bullet nose is spaced to the throat of the rifling, is a couple thousandths tighter than the 5.56 chambering.

This means pressures can spike dangerously in a .223 chamber when shooting mil-spec 5.56 ammo.

61 posted on 10/21/2010 7:20:55 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson