Posted on 10/09/2010 8:08:47 AM PDT by prisoner6
Something I've always wondered about, especially after all those Disney movies/TV programs from the '50's and '60's.
Both accents have obviously diverged. I wonder if we woould be able to understand our sncestors.
sncestors.
sncestors.
sncestors.
sncestors.
sncestors.
Does not compute. :O)
Something like 7 generations seperated them from Britain. As I understand it, the colonists were considerably taller than the brits as well.
Pirates must be rhotic speakers.
Sourced, but, if this hypothesis is accurate, then why was the dialog in Dickens’ writing praised for so accurately presenting the nuances of the various regional dialects (a skill he developed while serving in some capacity as government reporter, where he could tell the region of a speaker by the accent)? Those sorts of nuances don’t develop in merely half a century.
I’m not saying that this is not possible, it is. But it is far more likely that the early colonists spoke the English they came here with and that the “America” dialect commenced when immigration began in earnest and Americans had been here for several generations. Thus, it is far more likely that we did, in fact, diverge from the English accent into an amalgamation of dialects from various immigrant accents.
I’ve always wondered about this. It isn’t like we have lots of .mp3 files of Washington giving speeches to his troops.
Arrrhh!
this is one part of an accent....
saying Hard or Haaad
what about the rest of the accent.....?
Can’t stand a Brit accent ... someone with a mouthful of marbles makes more sense.
In my opinion the Australian accent is converging with the American accent.
I have always wondered the same thing. I always pictured the colonial era British sounding more like Charles Laughton of Captain Bligh, than Peter Noone of Herman’s Hermits.
Looks like I was right.
There’s a band of “r” coloring (”Rhoticism”) about 50 miles wide North to South that stretches from Baltimore to the Rocky Mountains ~ just listen to it when someone says “wash” (as in Warshington) or “squash” (as in Squarsh).
There’s a band of “r” coloring (”Rhoticism”) about 50 miles wide North to South that stretches from Baltimore to the Rocky Mountains ~ just listen to it when someone says “wash” (as in Warshington) or “squash” (as in Squarsh).
There’s a band of “r” coloring (”Rhoticism”) about 50 miles wide North to South that stretches from Baltimore to the Rocky Mountains ~ just listen to it when someone says “wash” (as in Warshington) or “squash” (as in Squarsh).
I used to wonder about the quasi accents of women in old movies, ie 30’s & 40’s. I looked it up & found that in the day, acting schools taught a “mid Atlantic” accent that sounds like something of a hybrid.
And with the increase in the Hispanic population, English and Spanish are converging in America. In a few decades I believe we’ll have a separate language called Spanglish. It’s already beginning.
So Bawney Fronk would've been Barney Frank had he been born in Iowa, which is still considered the center of the most proper Shakespearean English.
I’d just like to point out for those I know who will say it is: It isn’t my fault.
So interesting. They are pretty rhotic in Northumberland. We had a great laugh with our B&B hosts - who told ME, “We enjoyed listening to your interesting accents.” (We live in Los Angeles). “Oh, no, Geoff, YOU have the interesting accent.” He also asked me, “What is that word ‘cute’ you used? I don’t know that word. I had told him his B&B was so cute. The next morning he said, “I found that word ‘cute’ — it is archaic!” “But it is alive and well in Los Angeles.”
So interesting, the English language. Thanks for posting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.