I believe you asked for input. What else you got?
I wonder how many we could get to discuss THAT issue . . . let me see who else I can ping . . . TO THOSE WHO’VE POSTED ON THIS THREAD THAT I MANAGED TO PING TO THIS POST: 1. THOSE OF YOU who have watched at least 20 minutes of the videos of the conference . . . 2. Please respond to the following questions: 2.A) What are your own responses to the presentations? 2.B) Why do you think the vast bulk of the naysayers are strangely absent from this thread? 2.C) Why do you think the vast bulk of other posters who are not per se dyed in the wool naysayers . . . and who have on occasion posted on such threads with some interest and frequency—yet are strangely absent from this thread?
OH, HELP YOURSELF! BY ALL MEANS!
You are standing in for a once robustly filled category that’s not well populated on this thread. Great having you. You’re a very brazenly typical, average, dull example and it’s wonderful that you’re willing to fill-in so persistently. The thread would be missing some archaic flavor without your unbrilliant posts.
However, if you thought your responses would be treated as holy writ, then your assumptions are worse even than seems so blazingly evident.
You may not realize that part of the tradition of such threads is that the naysayers and crass and clueless folks try and play absurd games with the better informed. And some of us enjoy toying with them.
It’s a !!!!TRADITION!!!! thing.
Do you usually also tend to lose at spitwads in your classes?