Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Given where we are today with our corrupt anti-constitution government, it’s getting hader and harder to say we’re better off than we would have been had we remained under King George’s rule.


5 posted on 09/19/2010 9:59:46 AM PDT by Lorianne (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. ___ George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

RE: Given where we are today with our corrupt anti-constitution government, it’s getting hader and harder to say we’re better off than we would have been had we remained under King George’s rule.


The country that King George ruled isn’t doing any better today and an argument can be made that is doing even worse!


8 posted on 09/19/2010 10:06:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

“harder to say we’re better off than we would have been had we remained under King George’s rule.”

You have to be kidding. The UK is currently almost a totalitarian state. All they are missing is death camps. But the fun part is,, you don’t really need them when it becomes impossible to function if a nanny state disapproves of you. One non-PC statement can get you charged criminally, fired from most jobs, etc. The state is everything there.

Notice those guys who find Roman or pagan gold on their property lately in England? They don’t get it, the state does.

I’d rather be here still, we at least have a fighting chance,,,


48 posted on 09/19/2010 11:39:59 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
"...it’s getting hader and harder to say we’re better off than we would have been had we remained under King George’s rule."

The American Revolution wasn't against the King of England, it was against the traitorous Parliament who was using an incapacitated King as their prop.

Colonists were denied representation and were taxed by Parliament, not by the King of England.

53 posted on 09/19/2010 11:56:10 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson