Go back and read the thread - you raised the subject of C-14, not me. Any sane discussion of the Earth being 4.5 billion years old does not involved C-14, by definition.
You can't even keep track of your own strawmen.
My common experience has been that apologists for an old earth have been very dogmatic about insisting that decay rates are an unalterable constant. The big story here is the insecurity they feel (as reflected in this overbearing, pompous storyline) having that exposed as another ignorant and incorrect assumption. Creationists aren't making the mistake of claiming this neutrino evidence, itself, solves things in their favor. Our arguments are already out there and this article fails to address them. So who is really presenting a strawman?