Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre

The article referred to the alloy being harder than stainless steel, which isn’t a difficult goal to achieve. Stainless isn’t that hard when we compare it to tool steels which would be Rc of 60 or higher.

Many stainless alloys scratch pretty easily when confronted with some grit.


34 posted on 08/12/2010 10:02:57 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave
The article referred to the alloy being harder than stainless steel, which isn’t a difficult goal to achieve. Stainless isn’t that hard when we compare it to tool steels which would be Rc of 60 or higher.
Many stainless alloys scratch pretty easily when confronted with some grit.
Agreed, and of course the same is true of aluminum. What stainless and aluminum have in common, tho, is finish and corrosion resistance. If this amorphous metal is corrosion resistant, and if corrosion resistance is a desirable property in an iPod, iPad, etc, then it makes sense to compare the strength of those materials for that application.
The chart Swordmaker posted at 16 indicates that the subject material is markedly stronger than stainless or aluminum. Which, depending on the practicalities of fabrication, might be traded in whole or in part for weight reduction.

44 posted on 08/13/2010 4:21:32 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Entrenching an exploitative ruling class is all that socialism is about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson