Name calling is not proving a point in a debate or discussion. Your guys have to make up a theory, when it falls apart, then they make up another. The Big Bang is now a sitcom, gota love it.
Jesus Christ was a man, died for your sins, all you have to do is believe (make Him your Lord). You will have everlasting life, remembering that God raised him from the dead. Read the Book, it will open your heart and mind. Don’t be afraid.
God loves you.
After reading the back and forth comments since I sincerely answered your Comment 3, I see your request for information was insincere. Suggest you and wendy run off together to the Religion Forum, and leave us science oriented folks to suffer happily in our own way.
Since we spend considerable time trying to understand this fascinating universe that was created, however it might turn out to be, the result is that less and less of the simplistic stories of multiple uneducated people collected in a Book after a Committee decided to throw out quite a number of such stories that did not add up to a consistent story to satisfy the political needs of the Emperor Constantine are of any interest to us. Nor will they ever be.
Scientists make theories. Sorry if that offends you. The way a theory works is that if a more accurate theory comes along, it is replaced. That is how science works.
Jesus Christ is Lord. The heavens proclaim the glory of God. It is not all a trick and a lie with starlight speeds and radio-isotopic decay to make all things look the expected age. The dice are cast, but every result is from the lord. Chance doesn't mean that God is not in control. The fact that stars are forming right now through gravity and nuclear fusion doesn't mean that God did not create those stars. God created me from dust, and to dust I shall return. Yet I was also created through a cellular process involving DNA. Was the creation of Adam from dust more literal than me being created from dust?