Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rustbucket
Some in the North did envision using the forts to enforce the tariff...

I suppose those who thought that possible did not remotely comprehend the tactical situation. Sumter would be a nearly impregnable fortress in regards to an attack from the sea. But as we saw in April of 1861, it was pretty much defenseless against land-based batteries. It was reduced almost to rubble less than 40 hours from those land-based batteries. Fort Sumter was built to defend Charleston against a naval invasion, not to defend itself against an attack from Charleston.

347 posted on 08/06/2010 11:56:44 AM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Time to Clean House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
Confederates held the fort until 1865 despite both sea and land based shelling by the Union and an attempted assault by 400 sailors and marines in 25 boats.

On February 17, 1865, the Confederates left the fort. By the end, the fort was pretty much a pile of rubble. There are some pictures of the rubble in Link 1 and Link 2. Those old brick forts couldn't stand up to the newer canons of the time.

350 posted on 08/06/2010 12:26:42 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson